Free Trial

← Back to blog

Production managementReading time 12 min

Why the promised date is never the real date

The most common exchange on any shop floor is "when will this order be done?", and the most honest answer is usually "no idea". The people are not the problem; the scheduling method is.

01Lead time syndrome

Classic MRP backs into a release date using a fixed lead time. But lead time is an output of the system, not an input, as work in process grows, queue time grows, and actual lead time stretches with it.

  1. Dates are unreliable → release material early as insurance
  2. WIP grows → queues lengthen → actual lead time grows
  3. Someone lengthens the lead time parameter in the system
  4. Material is released even earlier → more WIP → back to step 2

Little's Law puts numbers on it: WIP = throughput × lead time. Throughput is capped by the bottleneck and effectively fixed, so the only lever on lead time is less WIP.

02The bottleneck decides everything

  • An hour lost at the bottleneck is an hour lost by the whole plant, and it never comes back.
  • An hour saved anywhere else is not a saving, it just produces more WIP.
  • Which means: the bottleneck must not go down, must not make scrap, must not wait for material, and must have the fastest changeovers.
PositionStrategy
Before the bottleneckHold a buffer so it never starves
The bottleneck itselfRun around the clock, maintain it first, inspect upstream
After the bottleneckNo buffer needed, but never let downstream block its output
Inspecting before the bottleneck matters most, scrap should never consume bottleneck capacity.

03Three ways to schedule

MethodCore ideaWhere it fits
MRP (infinite capacity)Backs off the BOM and lead timesMaterial requirements planning; not for sequencing operations
APS (finite capacity)Accounts for real machine, labour and tooling availabilityDiscrete manufacturing with many machines and operations
DBR (drum-buffer-rope)The bottleneck sets the beat; release is tied to itLines with one clear bottleneck
CONWIPHolds total WIP at a fixed levelChanging product mix, where the bottleneck moves
KanbanPull replenishmentStable demand, repetitive production
Most small and mid-size job shops are closer to CONWIP, the bottleneck shifts with the order mix.

DBR: the drum is the bottleneck's beat; the buffer is time protection ahead of it; the rope ties material release to the bottleneck schedule so nothing goes in early. Once release is constrained, WIP falls on its own and lead time shortens with it.

04What the scheduler has to be fed

  1. Routings, which machine each operation runs on, in what order, with what alternates
  2. Standard times, run time and setup time kept as separate numbers
  3. Machine calendars, shifts, maintenance, holidays
  4. Tooling and fixtures, the second resource everyone forgets
  5. Operator skill matrix, not everyone can run every machine

05Where to start

  1. Find the real bottleneck, look at where WIP piles up, not at the utilization report
  2. Measure setup times and record them separately from run time
  3. Cap material release, set a WIP ceiling and stop releasing when it is hit
  4. Put a buffer ahead of the bottleneck and watch how fast it gets consumed
  5. Use SMED to cut changeover so small batches become viable